Only a few years ago, the aggressive “New Atheist” movement was on the march, with rhetorical brawlers like Christopher Hitchens
and renowned biologists like Richard Dawkins leading the charge against
religion and the last vestiges of Christian faith in the West.
Religion, Hitchens famously stated, “poisons everything,” and could only
be considered, at best, humanity’s “first and worst” attempt to solve
existential questions. If these cobwebbed superstitions could be blasted
away by the refreshing winds of reason and the Enlightenment, a
fundamentally better society would rise from the ashes—or so the
thinking went.
But as Christianity fades further and further into our civilization’s
rear-view mirror, many intelligent atheists are beginning to realize
that the Enlightenment may have only achieved success because it wielded
influence on a Christian culture. In a truly secular society, in which
men and women live their lives beneath empty heavens and expect to be
recycled rather than resurrected, there is no solid moral foundation for
good and evil. Anti-theists like Christopher Hitchens mocked and
reviled the idea that mankind needed God to know right from wrong, but
scarcely two generations into our Great Secularization and we no longer
even know male from female.
It would be interesting to know how the late Hitchens would have
responded to the insanities that have proliferated since his passing,
and whether he would have come to realize, as some of his similarly
godless friends have, that one does not need to find Christianity
believable to realize that it is necessary. Douglas Murray, who has
taken to occasionally calling himself a “Christian atheist,” has publicly argued with Hitchens’ fellow “Horseman of the Apocalypse” Sam Harris over whether a society based on Enlightenment values is even possible without Christianity. Harris holds out hope that such a society is possible. Murray is sympathetic, but skeptical. --> READ MORE